<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using the unit of work-per-request pattern in ASP.NET MVC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mindscapehq.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/12/using-the-unit-of-work-per-request-pattern-in-aspnet-mvc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mindscapehq.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/12/using-the-unit-of-work-per-request-pattern-in-aspnet-mvc/</link>
	<description>The official blog of Mindscape</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:29:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Boyd</title>
		<link>http://www.mindscapehq.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/12/using-the-unit-of-work-per-request-pattern-in-aspnet-mvc/comment-page-1/#comment-88168</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindscape.co.nz/blog/?p=147#comment-88168</guid>
		<description>It depends what you are doing in your authorization filter. Hooking EndRequest or using Dispose() is the better choice if you are not always going to be returning an ActionResult or if you need to make use of the UnitOfWork instance after the result executes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends what you are doing in your authorization filter. Hooking EndRequest or using Dispose() is the better choice if you are not always going to be returning an ActionResult or if you need to make use of the UnitOfWork instance after the result executes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepak</title>
		<link>http://www.mindscapehq.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/12/using-the-unit-of-work-per-request-pattern-in-aspnet-mvc/comment-page-1/#comment-87950</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 04:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindscape.co.nz/blog/?p=147#comment-87950</guid>
		<description>are you sure OnResultExecuted will be called, if user is not authorized for action?!..

i think it is better to override Dispose(Disposing) method to dispose! which is called from controllerfactory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you sure OnResultExecuted will be called, if user is not authorized for action?!..</p>
<p>i think it is better to override Dispose(Disposing) method to dispose! which is called from controllerfactory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mindscape Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Unit of work scoping in LightSpeed</title>
		<link>http://www.mindscapehq.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/12/using-the-unit-of-work-per-request-pattern-in-aspnet-mvc/comment-page-1/#comment-32399</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindscape Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Unit of work scoping in LightSpeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 04:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindscape.co.nz/blog/?p=147#comment-32399</guid>
		<description>[...] because the HttpContext-dependent scope class can be swapped out for a simple scope class (see http://www.mindscape.co.nz/blog/index.php/2008/05/12/using-the-unit-of-work-per-request-pattern-in-a... for more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] because the HttpContext-dependent scope class can be swapped out for a simple scope class (see <a href="http://www.mindscape.co.nz/blog/index.php/2008/05/12/using-the-unit-of-work-per-request-pattern-in-a.." rel="nofollow">http://www.mindscape.co.nz/blog/index.php/2008/05/12/using-the-unit-of-work-per-request-pattern-in-a..</a>. for more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unit Of Work Pattern &#171; Hungry for Knowledge</title>
		<link>http://www.mindscapehq.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/12/using-the-unit-of-work-per-request-pattern-in-aspnet-mvc/comment-page-1/#comment-29404</link>
		<dc:creator>Unit Of Work Pattern &#171; Hungry for Knowledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindscape.co.nz/blog/?p=147#comment-29404</guid>
		<description>[...] Of Work per Request implementation is used. You can find a sample implementation in the article  Using the unit of work-per-request pattern in ASP.NET MVC and using NHibernate in NHibernate Best Practices with ASP.NET An alternative is the Unit Of Work [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of Work per Request implementation is used. You can find a sample implementation in the article  Using the unit of work-per-request pattern in ASP.NET MVC and using NHibernate in NHibernate Best Practices with ASP.NET An alternative is the Unit Of Work [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.mindscapehq.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/12/using-the-unit-of-work-per-request-pattern-in-aspnet-mvc/comment-page-1/#comment-21321</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindscape.co.nz/blog/?p=147#comment-21321</guid>
		<description>Dragan,

This is included as a sample with LightSpeed:

http://www.mindscape.co.nz/Products/lightspeed/download.aspx

Cheers,

Andrew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dragan,</p>
<p>This is included as a sample with LightSpeed:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mindscape.co.nz/Products/lightspeed/download.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.mindscape.co.nz/Products/lightspeed/download.aspx</a></p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Andrew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dragan Panjkov</title>
		<link>http://www.mindscapehq.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/12/using-the-unit-of-work-per-request-pattern-in-aspnet-mvc/comment-page-1/#comment-21309</link>
		<dc:creator>Dragan Panjkov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindscape.co.nz/blog/?p=147#comment-21309</guid>
		<description>well, as you&#039;re mentioned, give us and code sample on this :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, as you&#8217;re mentioned, give us and code sample on this :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.mindscapehq.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/12/using-the-unit-of-work-per-request-pattern-in-aspnet-mvc/comment-page-1/#comment-19592</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 22:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindscape.co.nz/blog/?p=147#comment-19592</guid>
		<description>Jason,

The sample is now available with our 2.0 beta.

Cheers,

Andrew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,</p>
<p>The sample is now available with our 2.0 beta.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Andrew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Links: ASP.NET MVC, Silverlight 2, TDD, WPF, jQuery&#8230; &#124; Code-Inside Blog International</title>
		<link>http://www.mindscapehq.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/12/using-the-unit-of-work-per-request-pattern-in-aspnet-mvc/comment-page-1/#comment-18255</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Links: ASP.NET MVC, Silverlight 2, TDD, WPF, jQuery&#8230; &#124; Code-Inside Blog International</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 11:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindscape.co.nz/blog/?p=147#comment-18255</guid>
		<description>[...] Using the unit of work-per-request pattern in ASP.NET MVC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Using the unit of work-per-request pattern in ASP.NET MVC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W&#246;chentliche Rundablage: ASP.NET MVC, Silverlight 2, TDD, WPF, jQuery&#8230; &#124; Code-Inside Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.mindscapehq.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/12/using-the-unit-of-work-per-request-pattern-in-aspnet-mvc/comment-page-1/#comment-18254</link>
		<dc:creator>W&#246;chentliche Rundablage: ASP.NET MVC, Silverlight 2, TDD, WPF, jQuery&#8230; &#124; Code-Inside Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 11:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindscape.co.nz/blog/?p=147#comment-18254</guid>
		<description>[...] Using the unit of work-per-request pattern in ASP.NET MVC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Using the unit of work-per-request pattern in ASP.NET MVC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reflective Perspective - Chris Alcock &#187; The Morning Brew #93</title>
		<link>http://www.mindscapehq.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/12/using-the-unit-of-work-per-request-pattern-in-aspnet-mvc/comment-page-1/#comment-18241</link>
		<dc:creator>Reflective Perspective - Chris Alcock &#187; The Morning Brew #93</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 07:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindscape.co.nz/blog/?p=147#comment-18241</guid>
		<description>[...] Using the unit of work-per-request pattern in ASP.NET MVC - Andrew Peters looks at implementing a testable unit of work per request in ASP.NET MVC. The article has example using MindScape&#8217;s Lightspeed ORM, however the principles apply across most other ORM products. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Using the unit of work-per-request pattern in ASP.NET MVC &#8211; Andrew Peters looks at implementing a testable unit of work per request in ASP.NET MVC. The article has example using MindScape&#8217;s Lightspeed ORM, however the principles apply across most other ORM products. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic (Requested URI is rejected)
Database Caching 4/19 queries in 0.108 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.mindscapehq.com

Served from: www.mindscapehq.com @ 2012-02-08 16:47:55 -->
