This thread looks to be a little on the old side and therefore may no longer be relevant. Please see if there is a newer thread on the subject and ensure you're using the most recent build of any software if your question regards a particular product.
This thread has been locked and is no longer accepting new posts, if you have a question regarding this topic please email us at support@mindscape.co.nz
|
HI Guys,
firstly thanks for making this tool, it has eased the transition to sass greatly in an MVC project I am working on. Now, I need to add some new sections to an ancient 'website' project, i.e. not a 'web application' project and I wanted to use sass but alas the options just don't seem to be there... Is this something you are aware of? Is there anything that can be done about it?
Thanks again! |
|
|
I'm having this same problem. Why would this be? |
|
|
We don't really support Web Site 'projects' at the moment. You can get syntax highlighting and intellisense by using the Text File template but manually entering the .scss file extension, but you'll need to manually compile the SCSS to CSS using the Sass Ruby command line. If you're opening to using Less instead of Sass, the dotLess project has a HTTP handler that you can add through your web.config to compile Less files when they are served, avoiding the need for compilation within Visual Studio. This might be a great fit for a Web Site project. dotLess: http://www.dotlesscss.org/ |
|
|
If will be great if you can consider supporting website projects as well. We develop most of our projects as website due to ease of partial updates. |
|
|
Arghh. I just purchased the Pro version and have immediately run into this. Is there any solution/workaround? |
|
|
Hello Matt, The only workaround I can think of would be to create a 'normal' project that references the same files as the Web Site. You would never build or deploy this project, but you would edit your Sass/Less/CoffeeScript files through it instead of through the Web Site. We're planning some architectural work that should enable us to add Web Site support, but that won't be for at least a couple of months. |
|