This thread looks to be a little on the old side and therefore may no longer be relevant. Please see if there is a newer thread on the subject and ensure you're using the most recent build of any software if your question regards a particular product.
This thread has been locked and is no longer accepting new posts, if you have a question regarding this topic please email us at support@mindscape.co.nz
|
I just recently installed Lightspeed within the last 2-3 weeks and love the way the designer works and the ease of use. The only issue that I currently have are the Nullable Parameters to Stored Procedures. I read a post by another user regarding support for Nullable Parameters and there was a response which read: "...At the moment, you'd need to write the procedure calls explicitly, using ProcedureQuery and ProcedureParameter objects. However, I've now committed designer support for nullable parameters. So beginning with the 2 June nightly build (available from about 1500 GMT) you'll be able to select a procedure parameter in the designer and set its Is Nullable property to true. This will result in the method argument in the generated code being made nullable, e.g. int? maxId instead of int maxId. Note that we do not detect or infer parameter nullability. It will be up to you to mark parameters as nullable once you have created the procedure object in the LightSpeed model..." I was curious to know when the support for the Nullable Parameters will make it into the next production release rather than just through the nightly builds? I mainly trying to gauge whether I should go ahead and start creating wrapper methods based on what's created or wait for the next release. Thank you, George |
|
|
|
|
We haven't firmed up a date for the next formal release of LightSpeed, but it is likely to be sometime during August. This is not a definite commitment though! That said, nightly builds are fully supported and we have many customers who are happily using them in production environments. So if a nightly build contains a feature or bug fix that you need, I'd encourage you to go with it rather than waiting for a formal new version. |
|
|
|
|
Ivan, Thank you for response and suggestion. I apologize for the delay in getting back to you, but I will download the nightly build and give it a shot. George |
|
|
|
